Skip to content

Utah Mammoth NHL team stats, schedule, results, player stats, goalie stats, and historical performance

← Back to matchup
Team profile

Utah Mammoth

2026–27 season

More
Current season

Team metrics

A quick snapshot of Utah Mammoth’s current-season performance.

Games played 12
Wins 8
Losses 4
OT losses 0
Points 16
Point percentage 0.667
Goals for 46
Goals against 40
Goal differential 6
Expected goals · xG V1

Chance creation and prevention

Uses the season and game window selected in trends & shots. 12 / 12 selected games fully scored.

xG for / game3.73
xG against / game2.71
xG differential / game1.02

Recent game trend

xG forxG against

Latest 12 covered games.

06Oct. 1, 2026: 4.30 xGOct 1Oct. 3, 2026: 3.19 xGOct. 4, 2026: 3.68 xGOct. 6, 2026: 4.32 xGOct. 8, 2026: 4.45 xGOct. 10, 2026: 4.89 xGOct. 13, 2026: 2.65 xGOct. 15, 2026: 3.12 xGOct. 17, 2026: 2.75 xGOct. 19, 2026: 4.17 xGOct. 22, 2026: 2.78 xGOct. 24, 2026: 4.44 xGOct 24

Hover, tap or focus a point for game values.

Game-by-game values
DatexG xG against
Oct. 24, 20264.444.03
Oct. 22, 20262.781.94
Oct. 19, 20264.172.16
Oct. 17, 20262.753.04
Oct. 15, 20263.121.84
Oct. 13, 20262.653.27
Oct. 10, 20264.892.82
Oct. 8, 20264.452.43
Oct. 6, 20264.322.81
Oct. 4, 20263.683.74
Oct. 3, 20263.192.72
Oct. 1, 20264.301.67
What these values mean

Totals and rates use fully scored games only. Blocked attempts, empty-net attempts and shootouts are excluded. Goals are counted on the same scored attempts, so they may differ from boxscore totals. Missing coverage is not zero.

xG differential per game = (total xG for minus total xG against) divided by covered games. Total differential for this selection: 12.27 xG. These describe chances already taken, rather than predicting future results.

Play-by-play analytics

Team tendencies

Observed regular-season events, excluding shootouts.

Data coverage & availability

12 of 12 selected completed games have current event and shot data.

Attempts / game65.9
Corsi share (%)56.0
Fenwick share (%)56.3
Faceoff win %54.1
Penalties / game4.25

Season ranks among teams with complete coverage of their stored completed games: Corsi / game: 3 / 32 · Corsi share: 3 / 32 · Fenwick share: 3 / 32

Corsi & Fenwick

For and against across this selected, covered sample. All strengths; shootouts excluded. Corsi includes blocks; Fenwick excludes them. Goals are counted once.

Corsi for / against
791 / 621
Fenwick for / against
570 / 443
Corsi share (CF%)
56.0%
Fenwick share (FF%)
56.3%
Corsi / Fenwick differential
170 / 127
Explore season totals and per-60 rates in the Data Hub

Shot locations

How to read the shot map

Normalized toward the net on the right. Only events with usable locations appear.

GoalsSaved shotsMissesBlocks
Hover, tap or focus an attempt for details.

Recent game trend

Attempts for and against, over the latest 20 covered games in this selection.

Game-by-game values
GameAttempts / facedShots on goalGoalsCorsi againstFenwick for / againstCF% / FF%
2026-10-24Tampa Bay LightningatUtah Mammoth602856047 / 4850.0% / 49.5%
2026-10-22Utah MammothatSeattle Kraken703635151 / 3957.9% / 56.7%
2026-10-19Pittsburgh PenguinsatUtah Mammoth622954846 / 3156.4% / 59.7%
2026-10-17Edmonton OilersatUtah Mammoth622824342 / 3459.0% / 55.3%
2026-10-15Utah MammothatEdmonton Oilers562545839 / 3949.1% / 50.0%
2026-10-13Toronto Maple LeafsatUtah Mammoth572855042 / 4053.3% / 51.2%
2026-10-10Utah MammothatBuffalo Sabres753046256 / 3954.7% / 58.9%
2026-10-08Utah MammothatBoston Bruins803713556 / 2969.6% / 65.9%
2026-10-06Utah MammothatNew Jersey Devils633156646 / 4448.8% / 51.1%
2026-10-04Utah MammothatNew York Rangers693025543 / 3555.6% / 55.1%
2026-10-03Utah MammothatColumbus Blue Jackets723145148 / 3458.5% / 58.5%
2026-10-01Chicago BlackhawksatUtah Mammoth653264254 / 3160.7% / 63.5%
Season versus last 10 games

Last 10 coverage: 10 games. Counts use the games covered in each period.

MetricSeasonLast 10
Attempts / game65.965.4
Shooting %12.611.9
Avg distance (ft)31.531.1
Faceoff win %54.153.6
Penalties / game4.254.4
Detailed shooting breakdowns

Shot types

GroupAttemptsGoalsShooting %
snap236127.6
slap76817.0
Unspecified2210N/A
wrist1221316.5
tip-in69822.2
backhand50514.3
deflected700.0
bat600.0
wrap-around300.0
poke10N/A

Periods

GroupAttemptsGoalsShooting %
Period 12531310.7
Period 22871915.4
Period 32491310.9
Period 42150.0

Shot areas

GroupAttemptsGoalsShooting %
Other locations377157.7
Close range (20 ft or less)2932922.8
Slot (20-40 ft, centre)12124.8

Game situation (EV / PP / SH)

GroupAttemptsGoalsShooting %
EV645299.8
PP1341625.0
SH12116.7

Score before the attempt

GroupAttemptsGoalsShooting %
Tied2171110.9
Leading2912116.0
Trailing2831410.5

Home / away

GroupAttemptsGoalsShooting %
Home3062315.9
Away4852310.5
Faceoffs and discipline

Faceoff wins: 54.1% across 728 draws. Penalties taken: 51; drawn: 50; recorded penalty minutes: 125.0.

Faceoff zones are source event zone codes; no team-relative zone is inferred. Penalties drawn require an identified drawing player. Recorded duration includes all penalty types and may differ from boxscore PIM.

  • N: 115 wins, 99 losses (53.7%)
  • O: 144 wins, 110 losses (56.7%)
  • D: 135 wins, 125 losses (51.9%)
  • interference: 9
  • cross-checking: 7
  • tripping: 6
  • fighting: 5
  • hooking: 5
  • high-sticking: 4
  • holding: 4
  • roughing: 3
  • slashing: 2
  • too-many-men-on-the-ice: 2
  • unsportsmanlike-conduct: 1
  • misconduct: 1
  • boarding: 1
  • delaying-game-puck-over-glass: 1
What these statistics mean

Close range means within 20 ft of the net. Missing locations are excluded from distance and area percentages. EV / PP / SH is relative to the shooting team and compares recorded skater counts; unknown situations remain separate. These are observed results, not expected goals. Coverage may differ across teams and seasons.

Observed combinations

Lines & pairings

See who shares the ice and how their chances compare. Five-on-five, both goalies present, regular season.

Compare players together vs. apart in the combination explorer

10 / 10 games with usable five-on-five time898 / 900 attempts attributed in standard 3F/2D five-on-five play.

Last 10 team games · Ranked by shared ice time, not coaching line order. Missing charts and unreliable intervals are excluded.

Most-used forward trios

Forward trio

69:58 together · 7 games

xG share77.8%
Corsi for / against
101 / 56
Fenwick for / against
75 / 37
Corsi share
64.3%
Fenwick share
67.0%
xG for / against
6.21 / 1.77
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
48 / 18
Attributed goals
4 / 2
Corsi / 60
86.6 / 48.0
Fenwick / 60
64.3 / 31.7
Corsi / Fenwick differential
45 / 38
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
38.6 / 32.6
Shots on goal / 60
41.2 / 15.4
Goals / 60
3.43 / 1.72
xG / 60
5.32 / 1.52

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

65:19 together · 7 games

xG share51.7%
Corsi for / against
61 / 65
Fenwick for / against
42 / 50
Corsi share
48.4%
Fenwick share
45.7%
xG for / against
2.96 / 2.77
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
26 / 33
Attributed goals
2 / 1
Corsi / 60
56.0 / 59.7
Fenwick / 60
38.6 / 45.9
Corsi / Fenwick differential
-4 / -8
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
-3.7 / -7.3
Shots on goal / 60
23.9 / 30.3
Goals / 60
1.84 / 0.92
xG / 60
2.72 / 2.54

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

63:34 together · 10 games

xG share53.9%
Corsi for / against
50 / 45
Fenwick for / against
37 / 33
Corsi share
52.6%
Fenwick share
52.9%
xG for / against
2.68 / 2.29
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
25 / 22
Attributed goals
2 / 3
Corsi / 60
47.2 / 42.5
Fenwick / 60
34.9 / 31.1
Corsi / Fenwick differential
5 / 4
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
4.7 / 3.8
Shots on goal / 60
23.6 / 20.8
Goals / 60
1.89 / 2.83
xG / 60
2.53 / 2.16

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

59:29 together · 10 games

xG share59.3%
Corsi for / against
62 / 54
Fenwick for / against
42 / 35
Corsi share
53.4%
Fenwick share
54.5%
xG for / against
2.58 / 1.78
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
30 / 21
Attributed goals
4 / 2
Corsi / 60
62.5 / 54.5
Fenwick / 60
42.4 / 35.3
Corsi / Fenwick differential
8 / 7
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
8.1 / 7.1
Shots on goal / 60
30.3 / 21.2
Goals / 60
4.03 / 2.02
xG / 60
2.61 / 1.79

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

28:54 together · 4 games

xG share56.5%
Corsi for / against
38 / 17
Fenwick for / against
28 / 16
Corsi share
69.1%
Fenwick share
63.6%
xG for / against
2.09 / 1.60
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
19 / 15
Attributed goals
1 / 3
Corsi / 60
78.9 / 35.3
Fenwick / 60
58.1 / 33.2
Corsi / Fenwick differential
21 / 12
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
43.6 / 24.9
Shots on goal / 60
39.4 / 31.1
Goals / 60
2.08 / 6.23
xG / 60
4.33 / 3.33

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

26:50 together · 3 games

xG share50.7%
Corsi for / against
30 / 23
Fenwick for / against
16 / 16
Corsi share
56.6%
Fenwick share
50.0%
xG for / against
1.08 / 1.05
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
9 / 13
Attributed goals
2 / 2
Corsi / 60
67.1 / 51.4
Fenwick / 60
35.8 / 35.8
Corsi / Fenwick differential
7 / 0
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
15.7 / 0.0
Shots on goal / 60
20.1 / 29.1
Goals / 60
4.47 / 4.47
xG / 60
2.42 / 2.35

Compare together vs. apart

More forward trios
Forward trio

24:58 together · 3 games

xG share63.3%
Corsi for / against
35 / 19
Fenwick for / against
24 / 15
Corsi share
64.8%
Fenwick share
61.5%
xG for / against
2.05 / 1.19
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
20 / 11
Attributed goals
1 / 0
Corsi / 60
84.1 / 45.7
Fenwick / 60
57.7 / 36.0
Corsi / Fenwick differential
16 / 9
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
38.5 / 21.6
Shots on goal / 60
48.1 / 26.4
Goals / 60
2.40 / 0.00
xG / 60
4.93 / 2.86

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

20:55 together · 3 games

xG share34.2%
Corsi for / against
22 / 25
Fenwick for / against
15 / 15
Corsi share
46.8%
Fenwick share
50.0%
xG for / against
0.71 / 1.37
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
10 / 6
Attributed goals
0 / 0
Corsi / 60
63.1 / 71.7
Fenwick / 60
43.0 / 43.0
Corsi / Fenwick differential
-3 / 0
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
-8.6 / 0.0
Shots on goal / 60
28.7 / 17.2
Goals / 60
0.00 / 0.00
xG / 60
2.04 / 3.92

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

12:31 together · 7 games

xG share100.0%
Corsi for / against
17 / 0
Fenwick for / against
15 / 0
Corsi share
100.0%
Fenwick share
100.0%
xG for / against
0.50 / 0.00
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
8 / 0
Attributed goals
0 / 0
Corsi / 60
81.5 / 0.0
Fenwick / 60
71.9 / 0.0
Corsi / Fenwick differential
17 / 15
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
81.5 / 71.9
Shots on goal / 60
38.3 / 0.0
Goals / 60
0.00 / 0.00
xG / 60
2.39 / 0.00

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trioUnder 10 minutes

9:03 together · 7 games

xG share47.5%
Corsi for / against
12 / 6
Fenwick for / against
9 / 4
Corsi share
66.7%
Fenwick share
69.2%
xG for / against
0.27 / 0.29
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
6 / 4
Attributed goals
1 / 1
Corsi / 60
79.6 / 39.8
Fenwick / 60
59.7 / 26.5
Corsi / Fenwick differential
6 / 5
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
39.8 / 33.1
Shots on goal / 60
39.8 / 26.5
Goals / 60
6.63 / 6.63
xG / 60
1.76 / 1.95

Compare together vs. apart

Most-used defense pairs

Defense pair

119:15 together · 10 games

xG share61.9%
Corsi for / against
146 / 103
Fenwick for / against
100 / 71
Corsi share
58.6%
Fenwick share
58.5%
xG for / against
7.66 / 4.72
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
67 / 44
Attributed goals
5 / 8
Corsi / 60
73.5 / 51.8
Fenwick / 60
50.3 / 35.7
Corsi / Fenwick differential
43 / 29
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
21.6 / 14.6
Shots on goal / 60
33.7 / 22.1
Goals / 60
2.52 / 4.03
xG / 60
3.85 / 2.37

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

91:58 together · 7 games

xG share59.7%
Corsi for / against
118 / 73
Fenwick for / against
85 / 53
Corsi share
61.8%
Fenwick share
61.6%
xG for / against
5.77 / 3.90
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
56 / 33
Attributed goals
3 / 5
Corsi / 60
77.0 / 47.6
Fenwick / 60
55.5 / 34.6
Corsi / Fenwick differential
45 / 32
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
29.4 / 20.9
Shots on goal / 60
36.5 / 21.5
Goals / 60
1.96 / 3.26
xG / 60
3.76 / 2.54

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

67:33 together · 10 games

xG share43.4%
Corsi for / against
68 / 62
Fenwick for / against
42 / 46
Corsi share
52.3%
Fenwick share
47.7%
xG for / against
2.38 / 3.10
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
28 / 30
Attributed goals
1 / 4
Corsi / 60
60.4 / 55.1
Fenwick / 60
37.3 / 40.9
Corsi / Fenwick differential
6 / -4
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
5.3 / -3.6
Shots on goal / 60
24.9 / 26.6
Goals / 60
0.89 / 3.55
xG / 60
2.11 / 2.75

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

41:21 together · 10 games

xG share59.9%
Corsi for / against
34 / 26
Fenwick for / against
24 / 17
Corsi share
56.7%
Fenwick share
58.5%
xG for / against
1.15 / 0.77
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
15 / 9
Attributed goals
0 / 2
Corsi / 60
49.3 / 37.7
Fenwick / 60
34.8 / 24.7
Corsi / Fenwick differential
8 / 7
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
11.6 / 10.2
Shots on goal / 60
21.8 / 13.1
Goals / 60
0.00 / 2.90
xG / 60
1.66 / 1.11

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

24:18 together · 3 games

xG share42.4%
Corsi for / against
21 / 21
Fenwick for / against
17 / 17
Corsi share
50.0%
Fenwick share
50.0%
xG for / against
0.90 / 1.22
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
9 / 15
Attributed goals
0 / 1
Corsi / 60
51.9 / 51.9
Fenwick / 60
42.0 / 42.0
Corsi / Fenwick differential
0 / 0
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
0.0 / 0.0
Shots on goal / 60
22.2 / 37.0
Goals / 60
0.00 / 2.47
xG / 60
2.22 / 3.01

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

22:25 together · 9 games

xG share59.1%
Corsi for / against
27 / 25
Fenwick for / against
21 / 15
Corsi share
51.9%
Fenwick share
58.3%
xG for / against
1.72 / 1.19
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
12 / 12
Attributed goals
1 / 1
Corsi / 60
72.3 / 66.9
Fenwick / 60
56.2 / 40.1
Corsi / Fenwick differential
2 / 6
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
5.4 / 16.1
Shots on goal / 60
32.1 / 32.1
Goals / 60
2.68 / 2.68
xG / 60
4.61 / 3.18

Compare together vs. apart

More defense pairs
Defense pair

19:59 together · 10 games

xG share64.0%
Corsi for / against
17 / 14
Fenwick for / against
9 / 10
Corsi share
54.8%
Fenwick share
47.4%
xG for / against
0.87 / 0.49
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
6 / 7
Attributed goals
1 / 0
Corsi / 60
51.0 / 42.0
Fenwick / 60
27.0 / 30.0
Corsi / Fenwick differential
3 / -1
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
9.0 / -3.0
Shots on goal / 60
18.0 / 21.0
Goals / 60
3.00 / 0.00
xG / 60
2.61 / 1.47

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

16:20 together · 10 games

xG share56.1%
Corsi for / against
14 / 8
Fenwick for / against
10 / 6
Corsi share
63.6%
Fenwick share
62.5%
xG for / against
0.59 / 0.46
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
7 / 5
Attributed goals
2 / 0
Corsi / 60
51.4 / 29.4
Fenwick / 60
36.7 / 22.0
Corsi / Fenwick differential
6 / 4
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
22.0 / 14.7
Shots on goal / 60
25.7 / 18.4
Goals / 60
7.35 / 0.00
xG / 60
2.16 / 1.69

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

10:21 together · 10 games

xG share69.1%
Corsi for / against
8 / 7
Fenwick for / against
7 / 5
Corsi share
53.3%
Fenwick share
58.3%
xG for / against
0.41 / 0.18
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
3 / 3
Attributed goals
0 / 0
Corsi / 60
46.4 / 40.6
Fenwick / 60
40.6 / 29.0
Corsi / Fenwick differential
1 / 2
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
5.8 / 11.6
Shots on goal / 60
17.4 / 17.4
Goals / 60
0.00 / 0.00
xG / 60
2.39 / 1.07

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

10:01 together · 7 games

xG share78.3%
Corsi for / against
8 / 6
Fenwick for / against
6 / 5
Corsi share
57.1%
Fenwick share
54.5%
xG for / against
0.57 / 0.16
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
4 / 3
Attributed goals
1 / 0
Corsi / 60
47.9 / 35.9
Fenwick / 60
35.9 / 30.0
Corsi / Fenwick differential
2 / 1
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
12.0 / 6.0
Shots on goal / 60
24.0 / 18.0
Goals / 60
5.99 / 0.00
xG / 60
3.43 / 0.95

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pairUnder 10 minutes

8:50 together · 6 games

xG share54.2%
Corsi for / against
11 / 14
Fenwick for / against
10 / 9
Corsi share
44.0%
Fenwick share
52.6%
xG for / against
0.66 / 0.56
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
6 / 5
Attributed goals
3 / 0
Corsi / 60
74.7 / 95.1
Fenwick / 60
67.9 / 61.1
Corsi / Fenwick differential
-3 / 1
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
-20.4 / 6.8
Shots on goal / 60
40.8 / 34.0
Goals / 60
20.38 / 0.00
xG / 60
4.49 / 3.79

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pairUnder 10 minutes

6:59 together · 10 games

xG share39.0%
Corsi for / against
4 / 9
Fenwick for / against
4 / 5
Corsi share
30.8%
Fenwick share
44.4%
xG for / against
0.32 / 0.49
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
2 / 4
Attributed goals
0 / 0
Corsi / 60
34.4 / 77.3
Fenwick / 60
34.4 / 43.0
Corsi / Fenwick differential
-5 / -1
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
-43.0 / -8.6
Shots on goal / 60
17.2 / 34.4
Goals / 60
0.00 / 0.00
xG / 60
2.72 / 4.25

Compare together vs. apart

How groups and coverage are measured

These are past observed combinations, not confirmed upcoming lines. Forward trios require three forwards together; defense pairs require two defensemen. Both teams must have five skaters and one goalie, with game-specific player positions available. Time affected by missing, invalid or overlapping shifts is withheld.

Goals and shots at a change tick are attributed only when the measured groups are unchanged or the participants identify one consistent lineup. Otherwise the event is omitted. Events with contradictory identities or strength are also excluded, so totals may be below official game totals.

xG is shown only when every eligible five-on-five unblocked attempt in every contributing game has a current score. Missing scores stay unknown. Per-60 rates use the group's measured shared ice time; small samples can swing sharply. Forward and defense results overlap in time and must not be added together. Opponents and other teammates also affect these descriptive statistics.

Explore shift data

xG uses fully scored regular-season appearances for this team only, excluding blocked attempts, empty-net attempts and shootouts. Goals above xG compares goals with expected goals on that same shot sample. Coverage can differ from GP and season goal totals. Missing data is shown as —.

#1 Clayton Keller
GP12
Points15
Goals4
Assists11
Shots26
Avg TOI17.78
Individual xG3.07
Goals above xG-0.07
xG / 600.86
xG games covered12 / 12
#2 Mikhail Sergachev
GP12
Points14
Goals3
Assists11
Shots32
Avg TOI23.31
Individual xG1.58
Goals above xG1.42
xG / 600.34
xG games covered12 / 12
#3 Nick Schmaltz
GP12
Points13
Goals7
Assists6
Shots31
Avg TOI17.97
Individual xG4.28
Goals above xG2.72
xG / 601.19
xG games covered12 / 12
#4 Logan Cooley
GP12
Points11
Goals3
Assists8
Shots13
Avg TOI18.07
Individual xG2.66
Goals above xG0.34
xG / 600.74
xG games covered12 / 12
#5 Dylan Guenther
GP12
Points10
Goals5
Assists5
Shots35
Avg TOI16.96
Individual xG4.65
Goals above xG0.35
xG / 601.37
xG games covered12 / 12
#6 Barrett Hayton
GP12
Points8
Goals1
Assists7
Shots23
Avg TOI14.13
Individual xG2.82
Goals above xG-1.82
xG / 601.00
xG games covered12 / 12
Rank Player GP G A PixGG − xGixG/60 PPG Shots Sh% Hits Blocks +/- Giveaways Takeaways PIM Shifts Avg TOI
1 Clayton Keller 12 4 11 15 3.07 -0.07 0.86 2 26 0.2 5 7 -5 14 2 8 256 17.78
2 Mikhail Sergachev 12 3 11 14 1.58 1.42 0.34 1 32 0.1 7 12 4 16 5 10 360 23.31
3 Nick Schmaltz 12 7 6 13 4.28 2.72 1.19 5 31 0.2 9 4 -7 12 4 2 265 17.97
4 Logan Cooley 12 3 8 11 2.66 0.34 0.74 1 13 0.2 15 6 -4 15 4 2 269 18.07
5 Dylan Guenther 12 5 5 10 4.65 0.35 1.37 4 35 0.1 6 4 -3 14 2 8 254 16.96
6 Barrett Hayton 12 1 7 8 2.82 -1.82 1.00 1 23 0.0 3 11 7 9 3 4 257 14.13
7 Kailer Yamamoto 7 3 4 7 3.05 -0.05 1.77 0 20 0.2 15 5 5 1 2 4 142 14.79
8 Vincent Trocheck 12 3 4 7 3.27 -0.27 0.97 1 18 0.2 34 7 -2 6 2 6 283 16.82
9 Anders Lee 12 3 3 6 5.05 -2.05 1.87 0 23 0.1 15 8 2 11 1 0 242 13.47
10 John Marino 9 2 3 5 0.36 1.64 0.12 1 8 0.3 2 4 5 17 2 2 263 20.38
11 Kevin Stenlund 12 1 4 5 1.14 -0.14 0.42 0 10 0.1 14 10 2 13 2 6 245 13.58
12 Daniil But 12 2 2 4 1.80 0.20 0.85 0 13 0.2 21 9 3 5 1 0 183 10.63
13 Dmitri Simashev 12 2 2 4 1.46 0.54 0.49 0 14 0.1 19 8 -1 12 1 2 274 15.05
14 MacKenzie Weegar 12 2 2 4 1.55 0.45 0.36 0 24 0.1 42 34 1 18 5 20 366 21.75
15 Andrew Peeke 12 1 3 4 0.39 0.61 0.12 0 11 0.1 11 15 -3 7 1 6 311 16.44
16 Lawson Crouse 12 1 3 4 2.79 -1.79 0.96 0 19 0.1 33 7 2 6 2 6 255 14.58
17 Jack McBain 12 1 2 3 2.31 -1.31 0.93 0 11 0.1 51 4 3 5 3 23 224 12.40
18 Nate Schmidt 12 1 2 3 0.70 0.30 0.17 0 13 0.1 17 9 0 10 1 0 367 20.20
19 Michael Carcone 5 1 1 2 1.61 -0.61 1.55 0 17 0.1 11 0 1 3 0 2 83 12.49
20 Nick DeSimone 3 0 0 0 0.21 -0.21 0.34 0 3 0.0 1 0 1 1 0 0 55 12.44

xG uses fully scored regular-season appearances for this team only, excluding blocked attempts, empty-net attempts and shootouts. GSAx = expected goals faced minus goals allowed on the same sample; positive means more goals saved than expected. Coverage can differ from GP and season goal totals. Missing data is shown as —.

#1 Karel Vejmelka
GP12
GS9
Wins6
SV%0.877
GAA3.13
Avg TOI46.29
xG faced26.07
GSAx-2.93
GSAx / 60-0.32
xG games covered10 / 10
#2 Sebastian Cossa
GP12
GS3
Wins2
SV%0.816
GAA3.33
Avg TOI13.50
xG faced6.40
GSAx-2.60
GSAx / 60-0.96
xG games covered4 / 4
Rank Goalie GP GS B W L OT GA SA SVs SO SV% GAAxGAGSAxGSAx/60 PIM Avg TOI EV SV% PP SV% SH SV%
1 Karel Vejmelka 12 9 3 6 3 0 29 228 200 1 0.877 3.13 26.07 -2.93 -0.32 10 46.29 0.898 0.783 1.000
2 Sebastian Cossa 12 3 9 2 1 0 9 49 40 0 0.816 3.33 6.40 -2.60 -0.96 0 13.50 0.864 0.400
Season 20262027
GP12
Points16
Wins8
Losses4
Point %0.667
Diff6
Season 20252026
GP82
Points92
Wins43
Losses33
Point %0.561
Diff28
Season GP W L OT Pts Pts% GF GA Diff
20262027 12 8 4 0 16 0.667 46 40 6
20252026 82 43 33 6 92 0.561 268 240 28