Utah Mammoth Team Stats, Schedule & Results

← Back to matchup

Team profile

Utah Mammoth

2026–27 season

Current season

Team metrics

A quick snapshot of Utah Mammoth’s current-season performance.

Games played 18

Wins 10

Losses 7

OT losses 1

Points 21

Point percentage 0.583

Goals for 63

Goals against 63

Goal differential 0

Expected goals · xG V1

Chance creation and prevention

Uses the season and game window selected in trends & shots. 18 / 18 selected games fully scored.

xG for / game3.73

xG against / game2.77

xG differential / game0.96

Recent game trend

xG forxG against

Latest 18 covered games.

Hover, tap or focus a point for game values.

Game-by-game valuesCompare expected goals with recorded results for each covered game

Date	xG	xG against
Nov. 7, 2026	2.95	2.83
Nov. 5, 2026	3.77	4.81
Nov. 3, 2026	4.36	1.87
Nov. 1, 2026	3.21	2.22
Oct. 29, 2026	5.10	2.78
Oct. 27, 2026	3.05	2.92
Oct. 24, 2026	4.44	4.03
Oct. 22, 2026	2.78	1.94
Oct. 19, 2026	4.17	2.16
Oct. 17, 2026	2.75	3.04
Oct. 15, 2026	3.12	1.84
Oct. 13, 2026	2.65	3.27
Oct. 10, 2026	4.89	2.82
Oct. 8, 2026	4.45	2.43
Oct. 6, 2026	4.32	2.81
Oct. 4, 2026	3.68	3.74
Oct. 3, 2026	3.19	2.72
Oct. 1, 2026	4.30	1.67

What these values meanCoverage, included attempts and how to interpret the numbers

Totals and rates use fully scored games only. Blocked attempts, empty-net attempts and shootouts are excluded. Goals are counted on the same scored attempts, so they may differ from boxscore totals. Missing coverage is not zero.

xG differential per game = (total xG for minus total xG against) divided by covered games. Total differential for this selection: 17.27 xG. These describe chances already taken, rather than predicting future results.

Play-by-play analytics

Team tendencies

Observed regular-season events, excluding shootouts.

Data coverage & availability18 / 18 games

18 of 18 selected completed games have current event and shot data.

Attempts / game64.5

Corsi share (%)54.1

Fenwick share (%)54.6

Faceoff win %53.4

Penalties / game4.33

Season ranks among teams with complete coverage of their stored completed games: Corsi / game: 3 / 32 · Corsi share: 5 / 32 · Fenwick share: 4 / 32

Territorial play

Corsi & Fenwick

Team attempts · All strengths

For and against in 18 covered games from the selected window. A share above 50% means more attempts for than against.

Corsi CF%

All shot attempts, including blocks

Share of attempts: 54.1%
Differential: +174

1161 for · 987 against

Fenwick FF%

Unblocked shot attempts

Share of attempts: 54.6%
Differential: +141

845 for · 704 against

Shootouts excluded; goals counted once. These shares describe recorded attempts, without adjustments for score or opponents.

Explore team totals & per-60 rates →

Shot locations

View Outcome

How to read the shot map

Normalized toward the net on the right. Only events with usable locations appear.

GoalsSaved shotsMissesBlocks

Hover, tap or focus an attempt for details.

Recent game trend

Attempts for and against, over the latest 20 covered games in this selection.

Game-by-game valuesIndividual results from the recent game trend

Game	Attempts / faced	Shots on goal	Goals	Corsi against	Fenwick for / against	CF% / FF%
2026-11-07 Utah MammothatOttawa Senators	61	33	2	60	49 / 45	50.4% / 52.1%
2026-11-05 Utah MammothatMontréal Canadiens	56	20	4	69	39 / 53	44.8% / 42.4%
2026-11-03 Utah MammothatToronto Maple Leafs	71	36	3	62	54 / 43	53.4% / 55.7%
2026-11-01 Utah MammothatPhiladelphia Flyers	55	22	3	47	38 / 32	53.9% / 54.3%
2026-10-29 Utah MammothatPittsburgh Penguins	64	35	4	64	52 / 44	50.0% / 54.2%
2026-10-27 Minnesota WildatUtah Mammoth	63	27	1	64	43 / 44	49.6% / 49.4%
2026-10-24 Tampa Bay LightningatUtah Mammoth	60	28	5	60	47 / 48	50.0% / 49.5%
2026-10-22 Utah MammothatSeattle Kraken	70	36	3	51	51 / 39	57.9% / 56.7%
2026-10-19 Pittsburgh PenguinsatUtah Mammoth	62	29	5	48	46 / 31	56.4% / 59.7%
2026-10-17 Edmonton OilersatUtah Mammoth	62	28	2	43	42 / 34	59.0% / 55.3%
2026-10-15 Utah MammothatEdmonton Oilers	56	25	4	58	39 / 39	49.1% / 50.0%
2026-10-13 Toronto Maple LeafsatUtah Mammoth	57	28	5	50	42 / 40	53.3% / 51.2%
2026-10-10 Utah MammothatBuffalo Sabres	75	30	4	62	56 / 39	54.7% / 58.9%
2026-10-08 Utah MammothatBoston Bruins	80	37	1	35	56 / 29	69.6% / 65.9%
2026-10-06 Utah MammothatNew Jersey Devils	63	31	5	66	46 / 44	48.8% / 51.1%
2026-10-04 Utah MammothatNew York Rangers	69	30	2	55	43 / 35	55.6% / 55.1%
2026-10-03 Utah MammothatColumbus Blue Jackets	72	31	4	51	48 / 34	58.5% / 58.5%
2026-10-01 Chicago BlackhawksatUtah Mammoth	65	32	6	42	54 / 31	60.7% / 63.5%

Season versus last 10 gamesCompare the full-season sample with recent form

Last 10 coverage: 10 games. Counts use the games covered in each period.

Metric	Season	Last 10
Attempts / game	64.5	62.4
Shooting %	11.7	10.9
Avg distance (ft)	31.4	31.5
Faceoff win %	53.4	55.1
Penalties / game	4.33	4.0

Detailed shooting breakdownsExplore shot types, strength and chance locations

Shot types

Group	Attempts	Goals	Shooting %
snap	310	18	9.0
slap	116	9	13.0
Unspecified	316	0	N/A
wrist	223	19	12.3
tip-in	94	10	21.3
backhand	76	7	13.0
deflected	13	0	0.0
bat	8	0	0.0
wrap-around	4	0	0.0
poke	1	0	N/A

Periods

Group	Attempts	Goals	Shooting %
Period 1	374	20	11.3
Period 2	397	21	12.1
Period 3	381	20	10.9
Period 4	9	2	40.0

Shot areas

Group	Attempts	Goals	Shooting %
Other locations	569	18	6.1
Close range (20 ft or less)	416	41	22.2
Slot (20-40 ft, centre)	176	4	6.7

Game situation (EV / PP / SH)

Group	Attempts	Goals	Shooting %
EV	940	37	8.6
PP	201	25	26.0
SH	20	1	9.1

Score before the attempt

Group	Attempts	Goals	Shooting %
Tied	393	19	10.4
Leading	390	23	13.1
Trailing	378	21	11.7

Home / away

Group	Attempts	Goals	Shooting %
Home	369	24	14.0
Away	792	39	10.7

Faceoffs and disciplineDraw results, penalties taken and penalties drawn

Faceoff wins: 53.4%
Penalties taken: 78
Penalties drawn: 78
Penalty minutes: 194.0

Faceoffs by source zone

Zone N53.3% wins

176 wins 154 losses

Zone O53.7% wins

201 wins 173 losses

Zone D53.2% wins

199 wins 175 losses

Penalties by type

Interference11
Fighting10
High-sticking8
Tripping8
Hooking8
Cross-checking7
Roughing7
Holding5
Slashing4
Too-many-men-on-the-ice2
Delaying-game-puck-over-glass2
Unsportsmanlike-conduct1
Misconduct1
Boarding1
Abuse-of-officials1
Holding-the-stick1
Embellishment1

Zones use source event codes; they do not imply the player's offensive or defensive zone. Penalties drawn require an identified drawing player. Recorded minutes include all penalty types and may differ from box-score PIM.

What these statistics mean

Close range means within 20 ft of the net. Missing locations are excluded from distance and area percentages. EV / PP / SH is relative to the shooting team and compares recorded skater counts; unknown situations remain separate. These are observed results, not expected goals. Coverage may differ across teams and seasons.

Observed combinations

Lines & pairings

See who shares the ice and how their chances compare. Five-on-five, both goalies present, regular season.

Compare players together vs. apart in the combination explorer

10 / 10 games with usable five-on-five time931 / 933 attempts attributed in standard 3F/2D five-on-five play.

Last 10 team games · Ranked by shared ice time, not coaching line order. Missing charts and unreliable intervals are excluded.

Most-used forward trios

Forward trio

60:46 together · 6 games

xG share69.5%

Corsi for / against: 75 / 57
Fenwick for / against: 62 / 40
Corsi share: 56.8%
Fenwick share: 60.8%
xG for / against: 4.82 / 2.12

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 43 / 24
Attributed goals: 2 / 3
Corsi / 60: 74.1 / 56.3
Fenwick / 60: 61.2 / 39.5
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 18 / 22
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 17.8 / 21.7
Shots on goal / 60: 42.5 / 23.7
Goals / 60: 1.97 / 2.96
xG / 60: 4.76 / 2.09

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

58:19 together · 10 games

xG share68.0%

Corsi for / against: 59 / 60
Fenwick for / against: 42 / 43
Corsi share: 49.6%
Fenwick share: 49.4%
xG for / against: 3.36 / 1.58

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 26 / 24
Attributed goals: 3 / 2
Corsi / 60: 60.7 / 61.7
Fenwick / 60: 43.2 / 44.2
Corsi / Fenwick differential: -1 / -1
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: -1.0 / -1.0
Shots on goal / 60: 26.8 / 24.7
Goals / 60: 3.09 / 2.06
xG / 60: 3.45 / 1.62

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

41:44 together · 10 games

xG share48.1%

Corsi for / against: 36 / 36
Fenwick for / against: 25 / 28
Corsi share: 50.0%
Fenwick share: 47.2%
xG for / against: 1.61 / 1.74

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 18 / 19
Attributed goals: 1 / 1
Corsi / 60: 51.8 / 51.8
Fenwick / 60: 35.9 / 40.3
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 0 / -3
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 0.0 / -4.3
Shots on goal / 60: 25.9 / 27.3
Goals / 60: 1.44 / 1.44
xG / 60: 2.31 / 2.49

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

40:22 together · 5 games

xG share56.4%

Corsi for / against: 45 / 33
Fenwick for / against: 30 / 23
Corsi share: 57.7%
Fenwick share: 56.6%
xG for / against: 1.97 / 1.52

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 21 / 16
Attributed goals: 3 / 2
Corsi / 60: 66.9 / 49.1
Fenwick / 60: 44.6 / 34.2
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 12 / 7
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 17.8 / 10.4
Shots on goal / 60: 31.2 / 23.8
Goals / 60: 4.46 / 2.97
xG / 60: 2.92 / 2.26

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

37:08 together · 7 games

xG share47.6%

Corsi for / against: 26 / 24
Fenwick for / against: 18 / 19
Corsi share: 52.0%
Fenwick share: 48.6%
xG for / against: 1.43 / 1.58

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 10 / 15
Attributed goals: 1 / 2
Corsi / 60: 42.0 / 38.8
Fenwick / 60: 29.1 / 30.7
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 2 / -1
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 3.2 / -1.6
Shots on goal / 60: 16.2 / 24.2
Goals / 60: 1.62 / 3.23
xG / 60: 2.31 / 2.55

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

34:25 together · 4 games

xG share50.4%

Corsi for / against: 43 / 36
Fenwick for / against: 31 / 29
Corsi share: 54.4%
Fenwick share: 51.7%
xG for / against: 1.88 / 1.84

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 20 / 11
Attributed goals: 3 / 0
Corsi / 60: 75.0 / 62.8
Fenwick / 60: 54.0 / 50.6
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 7 / 2
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 12.2 / 3.5
Shots on goal / 60: 34.9 / 19.2
Goals / 60: 5.23 / 0.00
xG / 60: 3.27 / 3.21

Compare together vs. apart

More forward trios

Forward trio

26:37 together · 8 games

xG share35.8%

Corsi for / against: 29 / 37
Fenwick for / against: 20 / 26
Corsi share: 43.9%
Fenwick share: 43.5%
xG for / against: 1.13 / 2.02

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 16 / 19
Attributed goals: 0 / 4
Corsi / 60: 65.4 / 83.4
Fenwick / 60: 45.1 / 58.6
Corsi / Fenwick differential: -8 / -6
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: -18.0 / -13.5
Shots on goal / 60: 36.1 / 42.8
Goals / 60: 0.00 / 9.02
xG / 60: 2.54 / 4.56

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

24:58 together · 3 games

xG share46.5%

Corsi for / against: 22 / 22
Fenwick for / against: 11 / 15
Corsi share: 50.0%
Fenwick share: 42.3%
xG for / against: 0.70 / 0.80

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 5 / 10
Attributed goals: 0 / 3
Corsi / 60: 52.9 / 52.9
Fenwick / 60: 26.4 / 36.0
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 0 / -4
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 0.0 / -9.6
Shots on goal / 60: 12.0 / 24.0
Goals / 60: 0.00 / 7.21
xG / 60: 1.67 / 1.93

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

18:56 together · 3 games

xG share73.9%

Corsi for / against: 32 / 15
Fenwick for / against: 23 / 13
Corsi share: 68.1%
Fenwick share: 63.9%
xG for / against: 1.54 / 0.54

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 15 / 8
Attributed goals: 0 / 0
Corsi / 60: 101.4 / 47.5
Fenwick / 60: 72.9 / 41.2
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 17 / 10
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 53.9 / 31.7
Shots on goal / 60: 47.5 / 25.4
Goals / 60: 0.00 / 0.00
xG / 60: 4.87 / 1.72

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

12:44 together · 6 games

xG share100.0%

Corsi for / against: 17 / 0
Fenwick for / against: 15 / 0
Corsi share: 100.0%
Fenwick share: 100.0%
xG for / against: 0.50 / 0.00

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 8 / 0
Attributed goals: 0 / 0
Corsi / 60: 80.1 / 0.0
Fenwick / 60: 70.7 / 0.0
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 17 / 15
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 80.1 / 70.7
Shots on goal / 60: 37.7 / 0.0
Goals / 60: 0.00 / 0.00
xG / 60: 2.35 / 0.00

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

12:18 together · 4 games

xG share50.4%

Corsi for / against: 8 / 7
Fenwick for / against: 5 / 2
Corsi share: 53.3%
Fenwick share: 71.4%
xG for / against: 0.12 / 0.11

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 4 / 0
Attributed goals: 0 / 0
Corsi / 60: 39.0 / 34.1
Fenwick / 60: 24.4 / 9.8
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 1 / 3
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 4.9 / 14.6
Shots on goal / 60: 19.5 / 0.0
Goals / 60: 0.00 / 0.00
xG / 60: 0.57 / 0.56

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trioUnder 10 minutes

9:30 together · 9 games

xG share38.2%

Corsi for / against: 11 / 8
Fenwick for / against: 8 / 5
Corsi share: 57.9%
Fenwick share: 61.5%
xG for / against: 0.25 / 0.40

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 5 / 5
Attributed goals: 1 / 1
Corsi / 60: 69.5 / 50.5
Fenwick / 60: 50.5 / 31.6
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 3 / 3
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 18.9 / 18.9
Shots on goal / 60: 31.6 / 31.6
Goals / 60: 6.32 / 6.32
xG / 60: 1.57 / 2.54

Compare together vs. apart

Most-used defense pairs

Defense pair

131:54 together · 10 games

xG share57.1%

Corsi for / against: 153 / 131
Fenwick for / against: 112 / 91
Corsi share: 53.9%
Fenwick share: 55.2%
xG for / against: 6.87 / 5.16

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 71 / 60
Attributed goals: 4 / 8
Corsi / 60: 69.6 / 59.6
Fenwick / 60: 50.9 / 41.4
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 22 / 21
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 10.0 / 9.6
Shots on goal / 60: 32.3 / 27.3
Goals / 60: 1.82 / 3.64
xG / 60: 3.13 / 2.35

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

91:14 together · 9 games

xG share55.4%

Corsi for / against: 75 / 79
Fenwick for / against: 51 / 53
Corsi share: 48.7%
Fenwick share: 49.0%
xG for / against: 3.33 / 2.69

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 30 / 33
Attributed goals: 3 / 5
Corsi / 60: 49.3 / 52.0
Fenwick / 60: 33.5 / 34.9
Corsi / Fenwick differential: -4 / -2
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: -2.6 / -1.3
Shots on goal / 60: 19.7 / 21.7
Goals / 60: 1.97 / 3.29
xG / 60: 2.19 / 1.77

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

52:37 together · 7 games

xG share48.7%

Corsi for / against: 46 / 43
Fenwick for / against: 34 / 36
Corsi share: 51.7%
Fenwick share: 48.6%
xG for / against: 1.96 / 2.07

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 23 / 31
Attributed goals: 1 / 3
Corsi / 60: 52.5 / 49.0
Fenwick / 60: 38.8 / 41.1
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 3 / -2
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 3.4 / -2.3
Shots on goal / 60: 26.2 / 35.4
Goals / 60: 1.14 / 3.42
xG / 60: 2.24 / 2.36

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

39:47 together · 10 games

xG share51.8%

Corsi for / against: 43 / 41
Fenwick for / against: 34 / 30
Corsi share: 51.2%
Fenwick share: 53.1%
xG for / against: 2.30 / 2.14

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 23 / 15
Attributed goals: 2 / 2
Corsi / 60: 64.9 / 61.8
Fenwick / 60: 51.3 / 45.2
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 2 / 4
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 3.0 / 6.0
Shots on goal / 60: 34.7 / 22.6
Goals / 60: 3.02 / 3.02
xG / 60: 3.47 / 3.23

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

22:57 together · 10 games

xG share61.2%

Corsi for / against: 28 / 16
Fenwick for / against: 18 / 12
Corsi share: 63.6%
Fenwick share: 60.0%
xG for / against: 1.48 / 0.93

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 12 / 9
Attributed goals: 0 / 1
Corsi / 60: 73.2 / 41.8
Fenwick / 60: 47.1 / 31.4
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 12 / 6
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 31.4 / 15.7
Shots on goal / 60: 31.4 / 23.5
Goals / 60: 0.00 / 2.61
xG / 60: 3.86 / 2.44

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

21:44 together · 3 games

xG share51.3%

Corsi for / against: 16 / 25
Fenwick for / against: 12 / 16
Corsi share: 39.0%
Fenwick share: 42.9%
xG for / against: 0.99 / 0.94

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 10 / 8
Attributed goals: 0 / 2
Corsi / 60: 44.2 / 69.0
Fenwick / 60: 33.1 / 44.2
Corsi / Fenwick differential: -9 / -4
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: -24.8 / -11.0
Shots on goal / 60: 27.6 / 22.1
Goals / 60: 0.00 / 5.52
xG / 60: 2.73 / 2.60

Compare together vs. apart

More defense pairs

Defense pair

21:26 together · 10 games

xG share61.2%

Corsi for / against: 20 / 14
Fenwick for / against: 13 / 12
Corsi share: 58.8%
Fenwick share: 52.0%
xG for / against: 1.37 / 0.87

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 10 / 8
Attributed goals: 2 / 0
Corsi / 60: 56.0 / 39.2
Fenwick / 60: 36.4 / 33.6
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 6 / 1
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 16.8 / 2.8
Shots on goal / 60: 28.0 / 22.4
Goals / 60: 5.60 / 0.00
xG / 60: 3.85 / 2.44

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

13:19 together · 1 game

xG share40.0%

Corsi for / against: 13 / 13
Fenwick for / against: 9 / 9
Corsi share: 50.0%
Fenwick share: 50.0%
xG for / against: 0.45 / 0.68

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 5 / 3
Attributed goals: 1 / 1
Corsi / 60: 58.6 / 58.6
Fenwick / 60: 40.6 / 40.6
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 0 / 0
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 0.0 / 0.0
Shots on goal / 60: 22.5 / 13.5
Goals / 60: 4.51 / 4.51
xG / 60: 2.03 / 3.05

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

12:56 together · 8 games

xG share83.2%

Corsi for / against: 18 / 9
Fenwick for / against: 12 / 6
Corsi share: 66.7%
Fenwick share: 66.7%
xG for / against: 1.13 / 0.23

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 7 / 3
Attributed goals: 0 / 0
Corsi / 60: 83.5 / 41.8
Fenwick / 60: 55.7 / 27.8
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 9 / 6
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 41.8 / 27.8
Shots on goal / 60: 32.5 / 13.9
Goals / 60: 0.00 / 0.00
xG / 60: 5.23 / 1.06

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pairUnder 10 minutes

9:58 together · 1 game

xG share41.5%

Corsi for / against: 15 / 15
Fenwick for / against: 10 / 13
Corsi share: 50.0%
Fenwick share: 43.5%
xG for / against: 0.63 / 0.89

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 5 / 6
Attributed goals: 0 / 0
Corsi / 60: 90.3 / 90.3
Fenwick / 60: 60.2 / 78.3
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 0 / -3
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 0.0 / -18.1
Shots on goal / 60: 30.1 / 36.1
Goals / 60: 0.00 / 0.00
xG / 60: 3.79 / 5.34

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pairUnder 10 minutes

9:53 together · 10 games

xG share61.7%

Corsi for / against: 8 / 11
Fenwick for / against: 7 / 8
Corsi share: 42.1%
Fenwick share: 46.7%
xG for / against: 0.59 / 0.36

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 5 / 6
Attributed goals: 0 / 1
Corsi / 60: 48.6 / 66.8
Fenwick / 60: 42.5 / 48.6
Corsi / Fenwick differential: -3 / -1
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: -18.2 / -6.1
Shots on goal / 60: 30.4 / 36.4
Goals / 60: 0.00 / 6.07
xG / 60: 3.57 / 2.22

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pairUnder 10 minutes

7:09 together · 6 games

xG share83.0%

Corsi for / against: 14 / 5
Fenwick for / against: 9 / 5
Corsi share: 73.7%
Fenwick share: 64.3%
xG for / against: 0.96 / 0.20

Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal: 6 / 4
Attributed goals: 2 / 0
Corsi / 60: 117.5 / 42.0
Fenwick / 60: 75.5 / 42.0
Corsi / Fenwick differential: 9 / 4
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60: 75.5 / 33.6
Shots on goal / 60: 50.3 / 33.6
Goals / 60: 16.78 / 0.00
xG / 60: 8.07 / 1.65

Compare together vs. apart

How groups and coverage are measured

These are past observed combinations, not confirmed upcoming lines. Forward trios require three forwards together; defense pairs require two defensemen. Both teams must have five skaters and one goalie, with game-specific player positions available. Time affected by missing, invalid or overlapping shifts is withheld.

Goals and shots at a change tick are attributed only when the measured groups are unchanged or the participants identify one consistent lineup. Otherwise the event is omitted. Events with contradictory identities or strength are also excluded, so totals may be below official game totals.

xG is shown only when every eligible five-on-five unblocked attempt in every contributing game has a current score. Missing scores stay unknown. Per-60 rates use the group's measured shared ice time; small samples can swing sharply. Forward and defense results overlap in time and must not be added together. Opponents and other teammates also affect these descriptive statistics.

Explore shift data

xG uses fully scored regular-season appearances for this team only, excluding blocked attempts, empty-net attempts and shootouts. Goals above xG compares goals with expected goals on that same shot sample. Coverage can differ from GP and season goal totals. Missing data is shown as —.

#1 Clayton Keller

GP18

Points24

Goals5

Assists19

Shots47

Avg TOI18.45

Individual xG5.68

Goals above xG-1.68

xG / 601.03

xG games covered18 / 18

#2 Logan Cooley

GP18

Points21

Goals11

Assists10

Shots31

Avg TOI18.48

Individual xG6.83

Goals above xG4.17

xG / 601.23

xG games covered18 / 18

#3 Nick Schmaltz

GP18

Points20

Goals9

Assists11

Shots47

Avg TOI17.66

Individual xG6.84

Goals above xG2.16

xG / 601.29

xG games covered18 / 18

#4 Mikhail Sergachev

GP18

Points20

Goals5

Assists15

Shots42

Avg TOI24.11

Individual xG2.59

Goals above xG2.41

xG / 600.36

xG games covered18 / 18

#5 Dylan Guenther

GP18

Points12

Goals6

Assists6

Shots46

Avg TOI17.17

Individual xG6.55

Goals above xG-0.55

xG / 601.27

xG games covered18 / 18

#6 Vincent Trocheck

GP18

Points10

Goals3

Assists7

Shots31

Avg TOI17.40

Individual xG4.64

Goals above xG-1.64

xG / 600.89

xG games covered18 / 18

Rank	Player	GP	G	A	P	ixG	G − xG	ixG/60	PPG	Shots	Sh%	Hits	Blocks	+/-	Giveaways	Takeaways	PIM	Shifts	Avg TOI
1	Clayton Keller	18	5	19	24	5.68	-1.68	1.03	2	47	0.1	7	11	-9	21	3	16	397	18.45
2	Logan Cooley	18	11	10	21	6.83	4.17	1.23	4	31	0.4	28	10	-5	22	8	8	403	18.48
3	Nick Schmaltz	18	9	11	20	6.84	2.16	1.29	7	47	0.2	10	9	-14	16	5	4	389	17.66
4	Mikhail Sergachev	18	5	15	20	2.59	2.41	0.36	2	42	0.1	12	27	-1	23	6	19	543	24.11
5	Dylan Guenther	18	6	6	12	6.55	-0.55	1.27	5	46	0.1	15	7	-12	22	4	8	374	17.17
6	Vincent Trocheck	18	3	7	10	4.64	-1.64	0.89	1	31	0.1	49	11	-1	16	4	11	419	17.40
7	Barrett Hayton	18	2	8	10	4.08	-2.08	0.95	1	35	0.1	3	14	8	13	5	4	382	14.37
8	Anders Lee	18	3	5	8	6.22	-3.22	1.51	0	32	0.1	16	9	2	14	1	0	359	13.69
9	Kailer Yamamoto	9	3	4	7	3.40	-0.40	1.57	0	21	0.1	18	6	4	2	2	4	181	14.48
10	Andrew Peeke	18	2	4	6	0.57	1.43	0.11	0	17	0.1	18	21	-3	13	1	12	488	17.70
11	Dmitri Simashev	18	3	2	5	1.89	1.11	0.41	0	18	0.2	25	13	-3	19	3	2	416	15.40
12	John Marino	9	2	3	5	0.36	1.64	0.12	1	8	0.3	2	4	5	17	2	2	263	20.38
13	MacKenzie Weegar	18	2	3	5	2.07	-0.07	0.31	0	33	0.1	57	50	-3	31	6	24	553	22.15
14	Kevin Stenlund	18	1	4	5	2.00	-1.00	0.50	0	16	0.1	17	15	-1	19	4	10	368	13.38
15	Lawson Crouse	18	1	4	5	3.96	-2.96	0.90	0	27	0.0	45	14	2	8	2	17	381	14.73
16	Daniil But	13	2	2	4	1.80	0.20	0.79	0	13	0.2	21	9	3	6	2	0	195	10.51
17	Nate Schmidt	17	1	3	4	0.90	0.10	0.17	0	17	0.1	20	14	-1	16	1	0	487	19.08
18	Jack McBain	18	1	2	3	3.15	-2.15	0.84	0	18	0.1	69	9	0	8	3	23	343	12.45
19	Michael Carcone	9	1	1	2	1.82	-0.82	1.03	0	20	0.1	25	1	-1	6	0	2	154	11.80
20	Artem Duda	3	0	0	0	0.43	-0.43	0.58	0	6	0.0	0	3	-3	2	2	0	63	14.71
21	Liam O'Brien	5	0	0	0	0.98	-0.98	1.44	0	5	0.0	19	5	0	2	0	14	67	8.17
22	Nick DeSimone	7	0	0	0	0.39	-0.39	0.25	0	5	0.0	3	1	-1	4	0	0	143	13.29

xG uses fully scored regular-season appearances for this team only, excluding blocked attempts, empty-net attempts and shootouts. GSAx = expected goals faced minus goals allowed on the same sample; positive means more goals saved than expected. Coverage can differ from GP and season goal totals. Missing data is shown as —.

#1 Karel Vejmelka

GP18

GS12

Wins6

SV%0.869

GAA3.29

Avg TOI40.52

xG faced34.05

GSAx-5.95

GSAx / 60-0.49

xG games covered13 / 13

#2 Sebastian Cossa

GP18

GS6

Wins4

SV%0.871

GAA3.30

Avg TOI19.20

xG faced15.85

GSAx-3.15

GSAx / 60-0.55

xG games covered7 / 7

Rank	Goalie	GP	GS	B	W	L	OT	GA	SA	SVs	SO	SV%	GAA	xGA	GSAx	GSAx/60	PIM	Avg TOI	EV SV%	PP SV%	SH SV%
1	Karel Vejmelka	18	12	6	6	6	0	40	298	259	1	0.869	3.29	34.05	-5.95	-0.49	10	40.52	0.889	0.776	1.000
2	Sebastian Cossa	18	6	12	4	1	1	19	147	128	0	0.871	3.30	15.85	-3.15	-0.55	0	19.20	0.889	0.789	0.500

Season 20262027

GP18

Points21

Wins10

Losses7

Point %0.583

Diff0

Season 20252026

GP82

Points92

Wins43

Losses33

Point %0.561

Diff28

Season	GP	W	L	OT	Pts	Pts%	GF	GA	Diff
20262027	18	10	7	1	21	0.583	63	63	0
20252026	82	43	33	6	92	0.561	268	240	28

Utah Mammoth NHL team stats, schedule, results, player stats, goalie stats, and historical performance

Utah Mammoth

Team metrics

Chance creation and prevention

Recent game trend

Team tendencies

Corsi & Fenwick

Corsi CF%

Fenwick FF%

Shot locations

Recent game trend

Shot types

Periods

Shot areas

Game situation (EV / PP / SH)

Score before the attempt

Home / away

Faceoffs by source zone

Penalties by type

Lines & pairings

Most-used forward trios

Most-used defense pairs