Skip to content

Carolina Hurricanes NHL team stats, schedule, results, player stats, goalie stats, and historical performance

← Back to matchup
Team profile

Carolina Hurricanes

2026–27 season

More
Current season

Team metrics

A quick snapshot of Carolina Hurricanes’s current-season performance.

Games played 15
Wins 11
Losses 2
OT losses 2
Points 24
Point percentage 0.800
Goals for 56
Goals against 36
Goal differential 20
Expected goals · xG V1

Chance creation and prevention

Uses the season and game window selected in trends & shots. 15 / 15 selected games fully scored.

xG for / game3.87
xG against / game2.49
xG differential / game1.39

Recent game trend

xG forxG against

Latest 15 covered games.

07Sept. 29, 2026: 2.64 xGSep 29Oct. 2, 2026: 4.18 xGOct. 3, 2026: 4.67 xGOct. 6, 2026: 4.05 xGOct. 8, 2026: 5.34 xGOct. 10, 2026: 3.95 xGOct. 11, 2026: 3.56 xGOct. 13, 2026: 2.99 xGOct. 17, 2026: 3.68 xGOct. 18, 2026: 3.94 xGOct. 20, 2026: 4.63 xGOct. 22, 2026: 3.43 xGOct. 24, 2026: 3.98 xGOct. 27, 2026: 4.03 xGOct. 29, 2026: 3.02 xGOct 29

Hover, tap or focus a point for game values.

Game-by-game values
DatexG xG against
Oct. 29, 20263.022.61
Oct. 27, 20264.032.06
Oct. 24, 20263.982.06
Oct. 22, 20263.432.90
Oct. 20, 20264.631.98
Oct. 18, 20263.942.82
Oct. 17, 20263.683.25
Oct. 13, 20262.992.75
Oct. 11, 20263.561.75
Oct. 10, 20263.952.23
Oct. 8, 20265.342.00
Oct. 6, 20264.052.26
Oct. 3, 20264.672.79
Oct. 2, 20264.183.59
Sept. 29, 20262.642.27
What these values mean

Totals and rates use fully scored games only. Blocked attempts, empty-net attempts and shootouts are excluded. Goals are counted on the same scored attempts, so they may differ from boxscore totals. Missing coverage is not zero.

xG differential per game = (total xG for minus total xG against) divided by covered games. Total differential for this selection: 20.78 xG. These describe chances already taken, rather than predicting future results.

Play-by-play analytics

Team tendencies

Observed regular-season events, excluding shootouts.

Data coverage & availability

15 of 15 selected completed games have current event and shot data.

Attempts / game66.4
Corsi share (%)58.9
Fenwick share (%)60.1
Faceoff win %50.0
Penalties / game4.07

Season ranks among teams with complete coverage of their stored completed games: Corsi / game: 2 / 32 · Corsi share: 1 / 32 · Fenwick share: 1 / 32

Corsi & Fenwick

For and against across this selected, covered sample. All strengths; shootouts excluded. Corsi includes blocks; Fenwick excludes them. Goals are counted once.

Corsi for / against
996 / 694
Fenwick for / against
748 / 497
Corsi share (CF%)
58.9%
Fenwick share (FF%)
60.1%
Corsi / Fenwick differential
302 / 251
Explore season totals and per-60 rates in the Data Hub

Shot locations

How to read the shot map

Normalized toward the net on the right. Only events with usable locations appear.

GoalsSaved shotsMissesBlocks
Hover, tap or focus an attempt for details.

Recent game trend

Attempts for and against, over the latest 20 covered games in this selection.

Game-by-game values
GameAttempts / facedShots on goalGoalsCorsi againstFenwick for / againstCF% / FF%
2026-10-29Columbus Blue JacketsatCarolina Hurricanes562735240 / 3851.9% / 51.3%
2026-10-27Boston BruinsatCarolina Hurricanes643024046 / 2261.5% / 67.6%
2026-10-24Carolina HurricanesatSt. Louis Blues623945053 / 3555.4% / 60.2%
2026-10-22Carolina HurricanesatEdmonton Oilers542755442 / 3850.0% / 52.5%
2026-10-20Carolina HurricanesatVancouver Canucks784463864 / 2867.2% / 69.6%
2026-10-18Carolina HurricanesatCalgary Flames813625864 / 4258.3% / 60.4%
2026-10-17Carolina HurricanesatWinnipeg Jets743735052 / 3859.7% / 57.8%
2026-10-13Washington CapitalsatCarolina Hurricanes773544754 / 3362.1% / 62.1%
2026-10-11Carolina HurricanesatPhiladelphia Flyers593044144 / 3459.0% / 56.4%
2026-10-10Carolina HurricanesatChicago Blackhawks723954856 / 3760.0% / 60.2%
2026-10-08Vancouver CanucksatCarolina Hurricanes543374146 / 2956.8% / 61.3%
2026-10-06Carolina HurricanesatMontréal Canadiens683363849 / 2964.2% / 62.8%
2026-10-03Carolina HurricanesatPhiladelphia Flyers794034362 / 2964.8% / 68.1%
2026-10-02Washington CapitalsatCarolina Hurricanes813324352 / 3465.3% / 60.5%
2026-09-29Florida PanthersatCarolina Hurricanes371505124 / 3142.0% / 43.6%
Season versus last 10 games

Last 10 coverage: 10 games. Counts use the games covered in each period.

MetricSeasonLast 10
Attempts / game66.467.7
Shooting %11.211.0
Avg distance (ft)31.131.3
Faceoff win %50.049.7
Penalties / game4.073.2
Detailed shooting breakdowns

Shot types

GroupAttemptsGoalsShooting %
backhand64816.0
snap308199.2
Unspecified2480N/A
tip-in6526.2
wrist2072113.9
slap7537.5
wrap-around600.0
deflected12225.0
bat700.0
poke4133.3

Periods

GroupAttemptsGoalsShooting %
Period 1304127.5
Period 23662613.8
Period 33181711.6
Period 48125.0

Shot areas

GroupAttemptsGoalsShooting %
Close range (20 ft or less)3603219.2
Other locations45072.8
Slot (20-40 ft, centre)1861721.2

Game situation (EV / PP / SH)

GroupAttemptsGoalsShooting %
EV787389.7
SH41520.8
PP1681315.9

Score before the attempt

GroupAttemptsGoalsShooting %
Tied446208.9
Trailing2151211.5
Leading3352414.1

Home / away

GroupAttemptsGoalsShooting %
Home3691810.4
Away6273811.7
Faceoffs and discipline

Faceoff wins: 50.0% across 894 draws. Penalties taken: 61; drawn: 56; recorded penalty minutes: 136.0.

Faceoff zones are source event zone codes; no team-relative zone is inferred. Penalties drawn require an identified drawing player. Recorded duration includes all penalty types and may differ from boxscore PIM.

  • N: 123 wins, 140 losses (46.8%)
  • D: 135 wins, 186 losses (42.1%)
  • O: 189 wins, 121 losses (61.0%)
  • tripping: 13
  • holding: 8
  • roughing: 7
  • hooking: 6
  • slashing: 5
  • interference: 5
  • too-many-men-on-the-ice: 4
  • delaying-game-puck-over-glass: 2
  • fighting: 2
  • unsportsmanlike-conduct: 2
  • interference-goalkeeper: 2
  • cross-checking: 2
  • misconduct: 1
  • embellishment: 1
  • high-sticking: 1
What these statistics mean

Close range means within 20 ft of the net. Missing locations are excluded from distance and area percentages. EV / PP / SH is relative to the shooting team and compares recorded skater counts; unknown situations remain separate. These are observed results, not expected goals. Coverage may differ across teams and seasons.

Observed combinations

Lines & pairings

See who shares the ice and how their chances compare. Five-on-five, both goalies present, regular season.

Compare players together vs. apart in the combination explorer

10 / 10 games with usable five-on-five time905 / 905 attempts attributed in standard 3F/2D five-on-five play.

Last 10 team games · Ranked by shared ice time, not coaching line order. Missing charts and unreliable intervals are excluded.

Most-used forward trios

Forward trio

112:12 together · 10 games

xG share59.4%
Corsi for / against
142 / 93
Fenwick for / against
107 / 66
Corsi share
60.4%
Fenwick share
61.8%
xG for / against
5.91 / 4.05
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
73 / 43
Attributed goals
6 / 4
Corsi / 60
75.9 / 49.7
Fenwick / 60
57.2 / 35.3
Corsi / Fenwick differential
49 / 41
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
26.2 / 21.9
Shots on goal / 60
39.0 / 23.0
Goals / 60
3.21 / 2.14
xG / 60
3.16 / 2.16

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

58:40 together · 10 games

xG share76.7%
Corsi for / against
86 / 40
Fenwick for / against
70 / 23
Corsi share
68.3%
Fenwick share
75.3%
xG for / against
5.35 / 1.63
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
42 / 18
Attributed goals
5 / 0
Corsi / 60
88.0 / 40.9
Fenwick / 60
71.6 / 23.5
Corsi / Fenwick differential
46 / 47
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
47.0 / 48.1
Shots on goal / 60
43.0 / 18.4
Goals / 60
5.11 / 0.00
xG / 60
5.47 / 1.66

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

33:02 together · 8 games

xG share39.8%
Corsi for / against
35 / 37
Fenwick for / against
27 / 25
Corsi share
48.6%
Fenwick share
51.9%
xG for / against
0.96 / 1.45
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
18 / 18
Attributed goals
1 / 0
Corsi / 60
63.6 / 67.2
Fenwick / 60
49.0 / 45.4
Corsi / Fenwick differential
-2 / 2
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
-3.6 / 3.6
Shots on goal / 60
32.7 / 32.7
Goals / 60
1.82 / 0.00
xG / 60
1.74 / 2.63

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

25:36 together · 3 games

xG share54.1%
Corsi for / against
36 / 30
Fenwick for / against
27 / 24
Corsi share
54.5%
Fenwick share
52.9%
xG for / against
1.70 / 1.44
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
16 / 16
Attributed goals
1 / 3
Corsi / 60
84.4 / 70.3
Fenwick / 60
63.3 / 56.3
Corsi / Fenwick differential
6 / 3
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
14.1 / 7.0
Shots on goal / 60
37.5 / 37.5
Goals / 60
2.34 / 7.03
xG / 60
3.98 / 3.39

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

24:04 together · 3 games

xG share63.2%
Corsi for / against
23 / 23
Fenwick for / against
21 / 19
Corsi share
50.0%
Fenwick share
52.5%
xG for / against
1.65 / 0.96
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
13 / 10
Attributed goals
1 / 0
Corsi / 60
57.3 / 57.3
Fenwick / 60
52.4 / 47.4
Corsi / Fenwick differential
0 / 2
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
0.0 / 5.0
Shots on goal / 60
32.4 / 24.9
Goals / 60
2.49 / 0.00
xG / 60
4.12 / 2.39

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

23:10 together · 2 games

xG share87.0%
Corsi for / against
22 / 10
Fenwick for / against
19 / 5
Corsi share
68.8%
Fenwick share
79.2%
xG for / against
1.45 / 0.22
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
15 / 4
Attributed goals
3 / 0
Corsi / 60
57.0 / 25.9
Fenwick / 60
49.2 / 12.9
Corsi / Fenwick differential
12 / 14
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
31.1 / 36.3
Shots on goal / 60
38.8 / 10.4
Goals / 60
7.77 / 0.00
xG / 60
3.76 / 0.56

Compare together vs. apart

More forward trios
Forward trio

21:26 together · 3 games

xG share53.6%
Corsi for / against
25 / 18
Fenwick for / against
21 / 14
Corsi share
58.1%
Fenwick share
60.0%
xG for / against
1.29 / 1.12
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
16 / 9
Attributed goals
0 / 2
Corsi / 60
70.0 / 50.4
Fenwick / 60
58.8 / 39.2
Corsi / Fenwick differential
7 / 7
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
19.6 / 19.6
Shots on goal / 60
44.8 / 25.2
Goals / 60
0.00 / 5.60
xG / 60
3.61 / 3.12

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

20:00 together · 2 games

xG share40.1%
Corsi for / against
16 / 18
Fenwick for / against
10 / 13
Corsi share
47.1%
Fenwick share
43.5%
xG for / against
0.81 / 1.21
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
9 / 8
Attributed goals
2 / 0
Corsi / 60
48.0 / 54.0
Fenwick / 60
30.0 / 39.0
Corsi / Fenwick differential
-2 / -3
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
-6.0 / -9.0
Shots on goal / 60
27.0 / 24.0
Goals / 60
6.00 / 0.00
xG / 60
2.43 / 3.63

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trio

15:58 together · 2 games

xG share89.1%
Corsi for / against
17 / 4
Fenwick for / against
15 / 3
Corsi share
81.0%
Fenwick share
83.3%
xG for / against
0.78 / 0.10
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
9 / 2
Attributed goals
0 / 0
Corsi / 60
63.9 / 15.0
Fenwick / 60
56.4 / 11.3
Corsi / Fenwick differential
13 / 12
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
48.9 / 45.1
Shots on goal / 60
33.8 / 7.5
Goals / 60
0.00 / 0.00
xG / 60
2.95 / 0.36

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trioUnder 10 minutes

9:24 together · 2 games

xG share45.1%
Corsi for / against
3 / 11
Fenwick for / against
3 / 8
Corsi share
21.4%
Fenwick share
27.3%
xG for / against
0.42 / 0.51
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
3 / 3
Attributed goals
2 / 0
Corsi / 60
19.1 / 70.2
Fenwick / 60
19.1 / 51.1
Corsi / Fenwick differential
-8 / -5
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
-51.1 / -31.9
Shots on goal / 60
19.1 / 19.1
Goals / 60
12.77 / 0.00
xG / 60
2.66 / 3.24

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trioUnder 10 minutes

9:09 together · 1 game

xG share56.5%
Corsi for / against
12 / 6
Fenwick for / against
9 / 5
Corsi share
66.7%
Fenwick share
64.3%
xG for / against
0.50 / 0.38
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
4 / 4
Attributed goals
0 / 0
Corsi / 60
78.7 / 39.3
Fenwick / 60
59.0 / 32.8
Corsi / Fenwick differential
6 / 4
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
39.3 / 26.2
Shots on goal / 60
26.2 / 26.2
Goals / 60
0.00 / 0.00
xG / 60
3.28 / 2.52

Compare together vs. apart

Forward trioUnder 10 minutes

8:42 together · 1 game

xG share64.6%
Corsi for / against
9 / 6
Fenwick for / against
6 / 4
Corsi share
60.0%
Fenwick share
60.0%
xG for / against
0.52 / 0.28
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
4 / 3
Attributed goals
1 / 1
Corsi / 60
62.1 / 41.4
Fenwick / 60
41.4 / 27.6
Corsi / Fenwick differential
3 / 2
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
20.7 / 13.8
Shots on goal / 60
27.6 / 20.7
Goals / 60
6.90 / 6.90
xG / 60
3.56 / 1.95

Compare together vs. apart

Most-used defense pairs

Defense pair

166:06 together · 10 games

xG share56.6%
Corsi for / against
178 / 124
Fenwick for / against
131 / 82
Corsi share
58.9%
Fenwick share
61.5%
xG for / against
8.20 / 6.30
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
92 / 56
Attributed goals
6 / 5
Corsi / 60
64.3 / 44.8
Fenwick / 60
47.3 / 29.6
Corsi / Fenwick differential
54 / 49
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
19.5 / 17.7
Shots on goal / 60
33.2 / 20.2
Goals / 60
2.17 / 1.81
xG / 60
2.96 / 2.28

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

160:09 together · 10 games

xG share60.5%
Corsi for / against
178 / 149
Fenwick for / against
145 / 113
Corsi share
54.4%
Fenwick share
56.2%
xG for / against
9.22 / 6.02
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
93 / 70
Attributed goals
9 / 4
Corsi / 60
66.7 / 55.8
Fenwick / 60
54.3 / 42.3
Corsi / Fenwick differential
29 / 32
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
10.9 / 12.0
Shots on goal / 60
34.8 / 26.2
Goals / 60
3.37 / 1.50
xG / 60
3.45 / 2.26

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

57:48 together · 5 games

xG share72.6%
Corsi for / against
65 / 34
Fenwick for / against
49 / 23
Corsi share
65.7%
Fenwick share
68.1%
xG for / against
3.64 / 1.38
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
34 / 16
Attributed goals
5 / 0
Corsi / 60
67.5 / 35.3
Fenwick / 60
50.9 / 23.9
Corsi / Fenwick differential
31 / 26
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
32.2 / 27.0
Shots on goal / 60
35.3 / 16.6
Goals / 60
5.19 / 0.00
xG / 60
3.78 / 1.43

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pair

52:08 together · 5 games

xG share67.0%
Corsi for / against
70 / 34
Fenwick for / against
59 / 24
Corsi share
67.3%
Fenwick share
71.1%
xG for / against
3.50 / 1.72
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
40 / 16
Attributed goals
5 / 2
Corsi / 60
80.6 / 39.1
Fenwick / 60
67.9 / 27.6
Corsi / Fenwick differential
36 / 35
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
41.4 / 40.3
Shots on goal / 60
46.0 / 18.4
Goals / 60
5.75 / 2.30
xG / 60
4.03 / 1.98

Compare together vs. apart

Defense pairUnder 10 minutes

7:14 together · 10 games

xG share4.2%
Corsi for / against
1 / 9
Fenwick for / against
1 / 6
Corsi share
10.0%
Fenwick share
14.3%
xG for / against
0.01 / 0.26
Goals, shots & per-60 rates

For / against while this group was observed together. Event totals include only confidently attributed attempts.

Shots on goal
0 / 3
Attributed goals
0 / 1
Corsi / 60
8.3 / 74.7
Fenwick / 60
8.3 / 49.8
Corsi / Fenwick differential
-8 / -5
Corsi / Fenwick diff. / 60
-66.4 / -41.5
Shots on goal / 60
0.0 / 24.9
Goals / 60
0.00 / 8.29
xG / 60
0.10 / 2.17

Compare together vs. apart

How groups and coverage are measured

These are past observed combinations, not confirmed upcoming lines. Forward trios require three forwards together; defense pairs require two defensemen. Both teams must have five skaters and one goalie, with game-specific player positions available. Time affected by missing, invalid or overlapping shifts is withheld.

Goals and shots at a change tick are attributed only when the measured groups are unchanged or the participants identify one consistent lineup. Otherwise the event is omitted. Events with contradictory identities or strength are also excluded, so totals may be below official game totals.

xG is shown only when every eligible five-on-five unblocked attempt in every contributing game has a current score. Missing scores stay unknown. Per-60 rates use the group's measured shared ice time; small samples can swing sharply. Forward and defense results overlap in time and must not be added together. Opponents and other teammates also affect these descriptive statistics.

Explore shift data

xG uses fully scored regular-season appearances for this team only, excluding blocked attempts, empty-net attempts and shootouts. Goals above xG compares goals with expected goals on that same shot sample. Coverage can differ from GP and season goal totals. Missing data is shown as —.

#1 Sebastian Aho
GP15
Points19
Goals8
Assists11
Shots44
Avg TOI19.81
Individual xG7.19
Goals above xG0.81
xG / 601.45
xG games covered15 / 15
#2 Jackson Blake
GP15
Points15
Goals3
Assists12
Shots42
Avg TOI18.11
Individual xG6.68
Goals above xG-3.68
xG / 601.48
xG games covered15 / 15
#3 Andrei Svechnikov
GP15
Points13
Goals6
Assists7
Shots41
Avg TOI17.64
Individual xG5.92
Goals above xG-0.92
xG / 601.34
xG games covered15 / 15
#4 Logan Stankoven
GP15
Points12
Goals9
Assists3
Shots46
Avg TOI17.32
Individual xG7.06
Goals above xG0.94
xG / 601.63
xG games covered15 / 15
#5 Nikolaj Ehlers
GP15
Points12
Goals4
Assists8
Shots31
Avg TOI16.26
Individual xG3.54
Goals above xG0.46
xG / 600.87
xG games covered15 / 15
#6 Shayne Gostisbehere
GP15
Points9
Goals2
Assists7
Shots27
Avg TOI17.54
Individual xG2.12
Goals above xG-0.12
xG / 600.48
xG games covered15 / 15
Rank Player GP G A PixGG − xGixG/60 PPG Shots Sh% Hits Blocks +/- Giveaways Takeaways PIM Shifts Avg TOI
1 Sebastian Aho 15 8 11 19 7.19 0.81 1.45 3 44 0.2 14 5 7 21 2 16 341 19.81
2 Jackson Blake 15 3 12 15 6.68 -3.68 1.48 1 42 0.1 5 4 10 12 9 8 285 18.11
3 Andrei Svechnikov 15 6 7 13 5.92 -0.92 1.34 3 41 0.2 30 2 5 21 6 10 302 17.64
4 Logan Stankoven 15 9 3 12 7.06 0.94 1.63 1 46 0.2 5 9 11 13 2 2 317 17.32
5 Nikolaj Ehlers 15 4 8 12 3.54 0.46 0.87 2 31 0.1 4 3 3 18 3 0 297 16.26
6 Shayne Gostisbehere 15 2 7 9 2.12 -0.12 0.48 1 27 0.1 7 8 10 15 3 4 301 17.54
7 Mark Jankowski 11 7 1 8 2.91 3.09 1.10 1 17 0.4 7 5 2 11 1 0 219 14.48
8 William Carrier 15 0 8 8 3.98 -3.98 1.22 0 27 0.0 47 8 1 9 1 10 263 13.08
9 Jordan Martinook 15 2 5 7 2.86 -0.86 0.78 0 24 0.1 21 6 1 10 1 6 311 14.75
10 Sean Walker 15 1 6 7 1.57 -0.57 0.30 0 28 0.0 18 32 3 22 8 14 376 21.27
11 Jesperi Kotkaniemi 13 3 3 6 0.88 2.12 0.34 0 13 0.2 14 6 5 10 4 6 190 11.78
12 Eric Robinson 15 2 4 6 2.35 -0.35 0.76 0 22 0.1 31 3 5 12 2 0 247 12.31
13 Taylor Hall 8 3 2 5 2.64 0.36 1.52 0 17 0.2 9 1 2 6 0 8 130 13.02
14 Seth Jarvis 4 1 4 5 1.36 -0.36 1.27 0 9 0.1 6 2 4 1 2 0 85 16.11
15 Jalen Chatfield 15 1 3 4 1.08 -0.08 0.21 0 22 0.1 7 19 6 18 10 6 368 20.80
16 K'Andre Miller 15 1 3 4 1.59 -0.59 0.28 0 22 0.1 14 14 1 17 8 6 376 22.49
17 Jaccob Slavin 15 0 4 4 0.89 -0.89 0.17 0 29 0.0 4 32 7 10 4 0 369 21.48
18 Nicolas Deslauriers 10 2 1 3 0.74 1.26 0.51 0 6 0.3 34 5 2 3 1 14 119 8.68
19 Juuso Välimäki 5 1 1 2 0.28 0.72 0.25 0 5 0.2 2 3 6 3 0 2 91 13.70
20 Bradly Nadeau 3 0 2 2 0.49 -0.49 0.69 0 3 0.0 4 1 -1 4 1 0 50 14.12
21 Mike Reilly 8 0 2 2 0.48 -0.48 0.29 0 9 0.0 15 6 4 5 3 2 142 12.44
22 Charles Alexis Legault 2 0 0 0 0.08 -0.08 0.20 0 2 0.0 3 2 0 3 0 12 35 11.89
23 Felix Unger Sörum 3 0 0 0 0.15 -0.15 0.25 0 3 0.0 0 2 0 0 1 2 46 12.01
24 Jordan Staal 6 0 0 0 0.76 -0.76 0.49 0 6 0.0 19 3 -2 3 0 0 143 15.56
25 Skyler Brind'Amour 2 0 0 0 0.49 -0.49 1.48 0 5 0.0 3 0 0 1 0 0 31 9.90

xG uses fully scored regular-season appearances for this team only, excluding blocked attempts, empty-net attempts and shootouts. GSAx = expected goals faced minus goals allowed on the same sample; positive means more goals saved than expected. Coverage can differ from GP and season goal totals. Missing data is shown as —.

#1 Pyotr Kochetkov
GP15
GS9
Wins9
SV%0.918
GAA1.66
Avg TOI36.18
xG faced21.26
GSAx6.26
GSAx / 600.69
xG games covered9 / 9
#2 Brandon Bussi
GP15
GS6
Wins2
SV%0.865
GAA3.27
Avg TOI24.49
xG faced16.07
GSAx-3.93
GSAx / 60-0.64
xG games covered6 / 6
Rank Goalie GP GS B W L OT GA SA SVs SO SV% GAAxGAGSAxGSAx/60 PIM Avg TOI EV SV% PP SV% SH SV%
1 Pyotr Kochetkov 15 9 6 9 0 0 15 184 169 1 0.918 1.66 21.26 6.26 0.69 0 36.18 0.923 0.893 1.000
2 Brandon Bussi 15 6 9 2 2 2 20 148 128 0 0.865 3.27 16.07 -3.93 -0.64 0 24.49 0.878 0.769 1.000
Season 20262027
GP15
Points24
Wins11
Losses2
Point %0.800
Diff20
Season 20252026
GP82
Points113
Wins53
Losses22
Point %0.689
Diff56
Season 20242025
GP82
Points99
Wins47
Losses30
Point %0.604
Diff33
Season 20232024
GP82
Points111
Wins52
Losses23
Point %0.677
Diff63
Season 20222023
GP82
Points113
Wins52
Losses21
Point %0.689
Diff53
Season 20212022
GP82
Points116
Wins54
Losses20
Point %0.707
Diff76
Season GP W L OT Pts Pts% GF GA Diff
20262027 15 11 2 2 24 0.800 56 36 20
20252026 82 53 22 7 113 0.689 296 240 56
20242025 82 47 30 5 99 0.604 266 233 33
20232024 82 52 23 7 111 0.677 279 216 63
20222023 82 52 21 9 113 0.689 266 213 53
20212022 82 54 20 8 116 0.707 278 202 76
20202021 56 36 12 8 80 0.714 179 136 43
20192020 68 38 25 5 81 0.596 222 193 29
20182019 82 46 29 7 99 0.604 245 223 22
20172018 82 36 35 11 83 0.506 228 256 -28
20162017 82 36 31 15 87 0.530 215 236 -21
20152016 82 35 31 16 86 0.524 198 226 -28
20142015 82 30 41 11 71 0.433 188 226 -38
20132014 82 36 35 11 83 0.506 207 230 -23
20122013 48 19 25 4 42 0.438 128 160 -32
20112012 82 33 33 16 82 0.500 213 243 -30
20102011 82 40 31 11 91 0.555 236 239 -3
20092010 82 35 37 10 80 0.488 230 256 -26
20082009 82 45 30 7 97 0.591 239 226 13
20072008 82 43 33 6 92 0.561 252 249 3
20062007 82 40 34 8 88 0.537 241 253 -12
20052006 82 52 22 8 112 0.683 294 260 34
20032004 82 28 34 6 76 0.463 172 209 -37
20022003 82 22 43 6 61 0.372 171 240 -69
20012002 82 35 26 5 91 0.555 217 217 0
20002001 82 38 32 3 88 0.537 212 225 -13
19992000 82 37 35 0 84 0.512 217 216 1
19981999 82 34 30 0 86 0.524 210 202 8
19971998 82 33 41 0 74 0.451 200 219 -19